Wicked Commentary

Posts tagged ‘congress’

House votes 419-1 to DEFY Obama…

Via Allen West

If you have any doubts about President Barack Obama’s state of delusion just consider his words on Monday at his first press conference since the election. As reported by ZeroHedge: Obama said he doubts President-elect Donald Trump will scrap a deal with Iran to curtail the country’s nuclear weapons aspirations because the agreement is working. When the accord was struck in 2015, “the main argument against it was that Iran wouldn’t abide by the deal,” Obama said Monday at a White House news conference. “We now have over a year of evidence that they have abided by the deal.” 

“My suspicion is that when the president-elect comes in and is consulting with his fellow Republicans on the Hill, that they will look at the facts,” Obama said. “To unravel a deal that’s working and preventing Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon would be hard to explain,” particularly if it leaves Iran free to reconstitute its weapons programs, he said.”

And it appears that just yesterday, members of the House of Representatives understood that as well. As reported by the Washington Examiner, The House voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to extend an Iran sanctions law for another 10 years, amid growing worries that the U.S. needs to keep some leverage over Iran as it pushes for that country to implement the nuclear agreement. 

Lawmakers voted 419-1 in favor of extending the Iran Sanctions Act, the foundation of a range of U.S. sanctions against Iran. 

The only vote against the bill came from Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. 

The vote is a sign the bill should easily pass the Senate. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said passage shows that Congress is ready to take a tougher stance on Iran than that of President Obama. While Obama has moved to ease sanctions against Iran, Republicans and even some Democrats say the U.S. needs to impose tougher measures to ensure Iran’s compliance.

“The nuclear deal has provided cover for Iran,” he said. “They are exerting more and more control in Iraq, sending arms to rebels in Yemen, and continue to support terrorist groups like Hezbollah that antagonize Israel.” 

“All the while, the Obama Administration has refused to hold Iran accountable or even call Iran out for violating the nuclear deal by exceeding limits on heavy water,” he added. “But we cannot let Iran increase its regional influence and undermine American interests unopposed.” 

“Congress needs these sanction authorities to respond to Iran’s violations and check Iran’s growing influence in the region,” he said. “Sanctions are what brought Iran to the table, and they can bring Iran to heel again.”

 

 

Original Article

 

Advertisements

Information Overload

Have you ever experienced little dots flashing before your eyes? I always chalk it up to being tired and stressed.

Lately, I’m feeling so stressed trying to keep up with all the information and all the happenings in the news. I feel like  years have passed since the 2016 election process started.

Has it been 10 years this has been going on? That’s how it feels to me.

Ever since Obama took office it’s been one thing after another; a new regulation; a new Executive Order no matter how unconstitutional it is; one injustice after another; bringing in so many refugees without vetting; the failed economic policies; his unjustified wars; his war against us.

Elites, globalists, Agenda 21, the UN, Establishment politicians, never Trumpers, BLM, Shooting cops, anarchy. What more could one ask for in information overload? Far too much going on all at once. I think it’s called “deliberate chaos” to keep us off-balance.

Then the election process starts and new stories, new lies, Wikileaks dumps, the MSM bias and their lies, the polls, electoral maps, Hillary scandals, Trump’s faux pas.

My brain feels like it exploded at some point by so much to take in from these information overloads, that my brain matter is now splashed up against the walls like some horror scene.

I can’t keep up any longer on all the articles to read. At some point my brain shuts down and I can no longer take anything else in. My psyche screams “Enough”!

What used to be fun for me writing on my blog, now feels like a chore from hell. I try to find something that nobody else has on their blog. But that isn’t always easy to do. Search for more stories, different ones. Vetting the veracity of the stories.

I find myself spending hours upon hours on the Internet when I’ve got personal things to take care of and chores to do that I’ve let go because by the time I’m finished reading and writing for hours, I am simply drained of energy. My body feels sluggish and I drag myself around trying to complete some chores, half done until I return again to finish them up. It’s erratic.

This is an important time in our history. This election means everything to do with what path are we going to take. Are we going to save our country and ourselves or are we going to turn down the black brick road to hell with Hillary Clinton. Everyone, including myself is consumed with it. So much is at stake.

I’m in a sleep deprivation mode now. I sleep in shifts of all kinds of different hours. I can’t seem to make up my sleep deprivation. My sleeping habits are about as nuts as anybody I’ve ever known. I know it’s due to the upcoming election. I need to put this in God’s Hands because what control do I or anyone else really have. We can vote. Some one else who is illegal, dead people and foreigners vote cancelling our votes out.

What will become of us if Hillary wins? What is the next step and is it inevitable?

“The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves.”
George Washington.

BOOM! Globalist Internet Agenda Halted

Four States Take Obama To COURT

(WE) Top law enforcement officials in four states filed suit Wednesday to delay the Obama administration’s proposed giveaway of a critical Internet agency to an international authority, saying the grantee would have the power to “effectively enable or prohibit speech on the Internet.”

The complaint, filed by Republican attorneys general in Arizona, Oklahoma, Nevada and Texas, argues the transfer violates several components of the administration’s statutory authority.

The administration’s plan to sign ownership of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority over to international Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers on Friday would consign the critical function of governance to an international community, the complaint contends, rendering the Web vulnerable to censorship by foreign powers, despite what the rules say.

“ICANN has a documented history of ignoring or operating outside of its governing bylaws,” AGs argued in the complaint. “In addition, even under NTIA’s [National Telecommunications and Information Administration] oversight, ICANN’s current practices often foster a lack of transparency that, in turn, allows illegal activity to occur.

“Nothing protects the Plaintiffs from additional occurrences of ICANN oversight failures or actions outside of ICANN’s bylaws that could expose Plaintiffs to significant expense or harm through illegal activity,” the AGs added.

Plaintiffs contend NTIA violated administrative law and statutory authority by failing to conduct the process in a more transparent manner, or obtaining authorization from Congress.

The administration has sought for several years to complete the transfer. Congressional critics, most notably Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, have attempted to block the transfer with by stripping its federal funding in a continuing resolution.

It’s somewhat of a relief to see these 4 states suing Obama. Congress, as usual, sits on its’ hands and does nothing.

 

Source

On The Run! Clinton Email Chief Goes AWOL!

Bryan Pagliano, a former information resource management adviser at the State Department that was in charge of setting up Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s controversial homebrew email servers, was scheduled to appear today at a hearing before the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

However, he decided to skip out on it — and it could mean BIG trouble for him.

Pagliano had spoken previously to the FBI under immunity. However, Pagliano refused to answer questions last year before a House panel investigating the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. His lawyers said at the time that Pagliano did not want to relinquish his rights under the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.

Tuesday morning Pagliano simply didn’t show up.

“It’s a serious matter. Mr. Pagliano has chosen to evade a subpoena duly issued by the committee. I will consult with counsel and my colleagues to consider a full range of options available to address Mr. Pagliano’s failure to appear,” Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz,  the chairman of the House Oversight committee, said.

“He should be here. When you are served a subpoena by the United States Congress, that is not optional,” he said.

Florida Rep. John Mica suggested that contempt of Congress

could be an option for the Committee, according to The Hill.

Contempt of Congress is considered a federal misdemeanor, and is punishable by a maximum $100,000 fine and a maximum one-year sentence in federal prison.

Sure, sure, just when has Congress or anyone else laid a fine and a jail sentence on anyone in this Clinton Fiasco.

Two officials from Platte River Networks also are scheduled to appear before the committee. In June 2013, after Clinton had left office, the server was moved from her Chappaqua, New York, home to a data center in northern New Jersey, where it was maintained by the Denver-based technology company.

Congressional Republicans last month issued subpoenas to Platte River Networks and two other companies – Datto Inc. and SECNAP Network Security Corp. – after they declined to voluntarily answer questions to determine whether Clinton’s private server met government standards for record-keeping and security.

The email issue has shadowed Clinton’s candidacy, and Republicans have been steadfast in focusing on her use of a private server for government business, with several high-profile hearings leading up to the election.

Chaffetz on Monday escalated the GOP’s battle with the FBI over its decision in July not to recommend criminal charges against Clinton for her use of the private email system by serving a top

FBI official with a subpoena for the full case file.

The move by Chaffetz underscores mounting frustration within the GOP over what Republicans see as stonewalling by the FBI over the Clinton probe. Chaffetz and other Republicans on the panel said the bureau has withheld summaries of interviews with witnesses and unnecessarily blacked out material from documents sent last month.

“We decide what’s relevant – not the Department of Justice, not the FBI,” Chaffetz said. “We are entitled to the full file.”

Chaffetz issued the subpoena to Jason Herring, the acting assistant FBI director for congressional affairs. Herring and six other Obama administration officials appeared before the committee to discuss the investigative files. The witnesses on several occasions said they could not answer the questions from lawmakers in an open forum.

The committee later voted to hold the remainder of the hearing in closed session. That session had to be postponed, however, because of a security issue.

FBI Director James Comey last week defended the decision to forgo criminal charges against Clinton after a yearlong probe into whether she mishandled classified information that flowed through the private email system located in her New York home. Comey told bureau employees in an internal memo that it wasn’t a close call.

The FBI provided portions of the Clinton probe file to Congress last month and warned lawmakers that the documents “contain classified and other sensitive material” and are not to be made public. Republicans have said the documents “did not constitute a complete investigative file,” as many of the records had been substantially blacked out or were missing altogether.

Source

 

WH Claims Obama Can Ratify U.N. Climate Treaty Because It’s an “Executive Agreement”

Bottom Line… the myth being trumpeted by the White House is that Obama can ratify this thing because it is an “executive agreement.”

I wonder where they found that in the Constitution?

It doesn’t really matter does it?  Because, Congress can simply refuse to fund it.  But, will they?

As Written By:   for The New AmericanAmid an illegal plot to “ratify” a United Nations treaty on “climate change” without the constitutionally required advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, Obama is behaving more and more like a tinpot dictator looting what remains of a collapsing banana republic. As part of the effort to defend the unconstitutional scheme to bypass Congress and “ratify” the UN climate regime, however, the White House and its globalist allies are twisting themselves into legalistic and rhetorical pretzels — and setting up the UN scheme for failure. The formal announcement ahead of the upcoming Communist Chinese-led G20 confirms what The New American first reported over two years ago.The UN, Obama, and Beijing are all hoping to get the agreement “ratified” before or during the G20 meeting in early September, according to news reports. Unlike the U.S. Congress, which Obama knows will not approve his dangerous UN “climate” regime, even the rubber-stamp legislature serving the brutal communist dictatorship enslaving mainland China is getting an opportunity to weigh in on ratifying the so-called “Paris Agreement.” Beijing’s propaganda organs are making a big show out of the fact that the “Standing Committee” of the “National People’s Congress” is deliberating on whether to ratify the controversial UN deal.By contrast, Obama plans to pretend to ratify it all by himself. Fortunately for Americans, though, by bypassing the proper ratification process, Obama is all-but ensuring that the “climate” treaty, negotiated in Paris last year, will eventually go down in flames. In fact, federal law now officially prohibits any U.S. funding for the UN climate bureaucracy, whether Obama pretends to ratify the UN climate deal or not. The strange turn of events vis-à-vis Obama, China, and the UN follows bizarre comments by former UN “Climate” Czarina Christiana Figueres, who blasted the U.S. political system but said the murderous Chinese regime was doing it right when it comes to battling alleged man-made global warming.

The blatantly fraudulent “legal argument” being advanced by Obama and the White House is that the UN Paris Agreement is actually an “executive agreement.” Therefore, they claim, Obama can ratify it with nothing more than his pen. In the real world, of course, the UN, the French government that oversaw the negotiations, and practically every government on earth have declared the Paris Agreement to be a “binding international treaty.” Indeed, the document itself makes that clear, with the word “shall” appearing in the text more than 100 times.

Read More:  http://www.thenewamerican.com/

Sometimes I feel like I could take a baseball bat to Congress and the people who voted for this lawless dictator, Barack Hussein Obama.

I often wonder about his voters. Just think of his name, BHO. What American family names their child, “Hussein”.

I’m getting off target here. Nowhere in the Constitution, which Hussein tells us he knows so well, (snark) is there any such thing as an “executive agreement”. He and his minions just throw up a few words out of nowhere to justify what this dictator is doing.

They may have gotten their ideas from a pizza parlor, where the chef just throws a new item onto the pizza hoping it will turn out to be palatable.

And for Congress, they better get off their butts and do something about this. Somehow I don’t think they will since they probably benefit from this “hoax”.  Follow the money.

How the RNC Has Screwed Us All

This is a reblogged article by Garnet.  Hardnox requested I run the article on my blog so my readers could become aware of what the RNC has done to all of us.  It’s a lengthy article and is documented. But it is a very important article and should be read by as many people as possible. It explains why so many elections are fraudulent  and nothing is done about it.  If you have the time read the documents listed in this article which is proof of the matter.

*********************************************************************

By Garnet92 | | , ,

Are you aware of the 1982 Consent Decree between the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)?

If you’re not, don’t be alarmed, most others don’t know about it either. Even if you’re a political junkie, it’s unlikely that you’ve been aware of the Consent Decree and what it means to voters – particularly Republican voters.

So you might say, I sometimes vote Republican, so what’s that mean to me?

It means that many well-informed, politically active Republicans (like you, perhaps?) could have their votes cancelled out by democrat voter fraud and, thanks to the RNC; our hands are tied to stop it.

While that may sound like some kind of conspiracy nonsense, it’s not, and we’ve got the evidence here. It just hasn’t been exposed as widely as it deserves. Essentially, the RNC agreed, by signing that Consent Decree, to limit our ability to compete on equal footing with the democrats.

Here’s how the whole debacle started: during the 1981 New Jersey gubernatorial election, the DNC and the New Jersey Democratic State Committee (DSC) brought an action against the RNC and the New Jersey Republican State Committee (RSC) in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey accusing them of discrimination against minority voters.

The RNC (and RSC) were accused of “voter caging” and other lesser misdeeds. The RNC (and RSC) allegedly created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters and then, when postcards were returned as undeliverable, they included those individuals on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.

At some point during the proceedings, the RNC apparently became convinced that they were losing the case, and thinking that they may be hit with tough sanctions, agreed to sign a Consent Order to escape the court’s wrath.

The Consent Order (also known as a Consent Decree) stopped the court from rendering a decision and even though the RNC didn’t admit to any illegal activity, they did agree to the terms of the Consent Decree.

So, on November 1, 1982, the RNC and the DNC signed a national Consent Decree which (among other things) limits the ability of the RNC (and its associates) to undertake “any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts” where a significant effect of such activities would be to deter qualified voters from voting. And, as if that wasn’t enough, the CD contained no expiration date or sunset provision, meaning that it would be in effect forever.

Here is a description of the activities surrounding the accusations and the decree itself.

Click here to link to the original 1982 Consent Decree as it was incorporated into a 11/3/2008 filing (a 5 page .pdf).

original 1982 Consent Decree

Click to enlarge

OK, so why is this pesky old agreement still giving us trouble 32 years later?

Because the RNC thought it acceptable to sign a legally binding agreement without any expiration date and without any concern for voluntarily neutering the Republican fight against fraudulent voting.

Following are the details of what the decree requires of the RNC and all of its agents and employees “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.” In all states and territories of the United States, they must:

(a) comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting the rights of duly qualified citizens to vote for the candidate(s) of their choice;

(b) in the event that they produce or place any signs which are part of ballot security activities, cause said signs to disclose that they are authorized or sponsored by the party committees and any other committees participating with the party committees;

(c) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their agents or employees to remove or deface any lawfully printed and placed campaign materials or signs;

(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;

(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

The (e) item is the harshest one since it specifies that nearly any activity that would target a “substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations” as a factor could be considered relevant evidence of the existence of a violation of the decree.

The RNC has tried to overturn the original Consent Decree several times, and each time the court has refused to vacate the decree. And each time the Decree is revisited, the Carter appointee judge who signed the original agreement (and has long since retired), comes back just so he can renew the order again.

In Louisiana during the 1986 Congressional elections, the RNC allegedly created a voter challenge list (again) by mailing letters to African-American voters and, then, including individuals whose letters were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge – voter caging again. The DNC once again alleged that the RNC had participated in voter suppression.

In response to a discovery request made in that suit, the RNC found and turned over to the DNC, a memorandum in which its Midwest Political Director stated to its Southern Political Director that “this program will eliminate at least 60,000–80,000 folks from the rolls . . . If it’s a close race . . . which I’m assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably.

I’d call that a “smoking gun” wouldn’t you? The RNC strikes again …

So in 1987, the RNC and DNC settled (again) by modifying the Consent Decree to require the RNC to obtain court pre-approval of any ballot security programs or poll watching efforts they intended to implement, and provide 20 days’ notice to the DNC. It further defined the term “ballot security activities” to mean “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”

In addition to providing its chief political rival with 20 days’ notice of its intended ballot-security actions, the modified Decree also required the RNC to state “a description of the program to be undertaken, the purpose(s) to be served, and the reasons why the program complies with the Consent Order and applicable law.”

But they weren’t finished yet.  As part of the order dated December 1, 2009, the court further modified the Decree by reducing the  notice period from 20 to 10 days, they added additional clarification of the term “Ballot Security” and “Normal poll-watch function” in addition to a few other items. But one of the major revisions was to place a limit on the term of the Decree. It was scheduled to expire on December 1, 2017 – UNLESS the DNC proves “by a preponderance of the evidence” that the RNC has (once again) violated the terms of the agreement – in which case, the Decree will be extended for another eight years from the date of that violation.

In war, sports, or politics, what happens when the opposition knows your strategy in advance? That’s easy – they win, you lose.

Also, in 1990, the DNC brought another lawsuit alleging that the RNC violated the Consent Decree by mailing 150,000 postcards to residents of predominantly African-American precincts. This program allegedly attempted to intimidate voters by warning that it is a “federal crime . . . to knowingly give false information about your name, residence or period of residence to an election official.”

The postcards falsely stated that there was a 30-day minimum residency requirement prior to the election during which voters must have lived in the precinct in which they cast their ballot.

The Consent Decree remained in full force and effect. Chalk up another screw-up by our friends who keep asking us to contribute, the Republicans.

The Consent Decree does help to explain how the 2012 election got turned from a likely Romney victory into a win for Obama. How else could 100 precincts in Ohio have 19,605 votes for Obama and zero for Romney? And what about the other precincts where Obama got 99 percent of the vote – how else does this happen, especially in a swing state?

Or another report out of St. Lucie county in Florida (another swing state), where they reported 247,713 votes cast when only 175,554 voters are registered (141.10% turnout). How did that happen? Was it a miracle? It seems like that should be evidence of voter fraud all by itself.

And the party “leadership” can’t even challenge them? It’s no wonder that voter fraud is widespread, the democrats aren’t worried about getting caught – who’s going to catch them? Can we expect them to voluntarily turn themselves in?

It’s hard to believe that the RNC really screwed up in their handling of the Consent Decree so badly, isn’t it? But wait, there’s more.

Following is the opinion of the 3rd circuit court in response to an RNC appeal in 2010. This is lifted from the actual court filing. Note the words the court used to chide the RNC for their idiotic handling of the Consent Decree:

The RNC asks that our Court vacate a decree that has as its central purpose preventing the intimidation and suppression of minority voters. When, as here, a party voluntarily enters into a consent decree not once, but twice, and  then  waits  over  a  quarter  of  a  century  before  filing  a motion to vacate or modify  the decree, such action gives us pause. Further, the RNC, with the advice of counsel, twice chose to limit indefinitely its ability to engage in certain activities enumerated in the Decree by entering into a decree with no expiration date.

Beginning to see how the RNC let all Republican voters down? By their really stupid activities and bonehead legal pleadings, they’ve insured that voter fraud will continue to help elect democrats while at the same time, legally prevent any RNC-related group from doing anything about it.

Here’s another comment from the court recognizing the stupidity of the RNC:

Furthermore, the District Court has never prevented the RNC from implementing a voter fraud prevention program that the RNC has submitted for preclearance, at least in part, because the RNC has never submitted any voter fraud prevention program for preclearance.

In other words, they haven’t even tried. The statement continues,

“If the risk of voter fraud is as great and consequential as the RNC alleges and an RNC voter security program is a significant part of efforts needed to prevent that voter fraud, it would seem that the RNC would have attempted to obtain preclearance for a voter security program at least once since 1987.”

Wouldn’t you think so? No one has been able to come up with anything in over 20 years?

We have a serious lack of critical thinking and leadership in the stratosphere of the Republican Party. Maybe that’s why we are winning so many elections.

Stalin was right when he said, “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”

~~~

Here is just a taste of what you’ll see via the links. This is another snip of one of the court orders and a link to a description of how the original 1982 order came to be – it is describing what happened:

Dec 2009 refuse to vacate

Click to enlarge

The important point is … WHY HAS THE REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP KEPT THIS CONSENT DECREE SECRET? WHY IS IT PRACTICALLY UNKNOWN?

That’s actually a rhetorical question – we know why.

If Republican voters knew that the party’s “leadership” has crippled our ability to combat democrat voter fraud – voluntarily – the contributions would dry up. Period.

~~~

Here are links to more real evidence – from the actual court documents. Note that they are all .pdf documents, the large ones may be slow to load, depending on your service..

PLEASE READ THEM and form your own conclusions.

  • This is the original 1982 Consent Decree as it was incorporated into a 11/3/2008 filing – 5 pages.

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-SDW Document 43-5 Filed 11/03/2008

  • RNC urges the Court to grant its motion to vacate the Consent Decree – 32 pages

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-SDW Document 43-4 Filed 11/03/2008

  •  DNC respectfully requests that the court deny Defendant’s Motion to Vacate – 37 pages.

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-MAS Document 55 Filed 01/19/2009

  • RNC urges the Court to grant its motion to vacate the Consent Decree or, alternatively, to modify it – 16 pages.

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-MAS Document 57 Filed 02/19/2009

  • RNC urges Court to Vacate the Consent Decree – 34 pages.

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-MAS Document 78 Filed 06/26/2009

  • DNC requests that the court deny Defendant’s Motion to Vacate – 43 pages.

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-MAS Document 79 Filed 06/26/2009

  • RNC’s Motion to Vacate the Consent Decree is denied. The Consent Decree will be modified – 79 pages.

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-MAS Document 84 Filed 12/01/09

  •  It is on this 1st of December 2009, ordered that the RNC’s Motion to Vacate the Consent Decree is denied – 3 pages.

Case 2:81-cv-03876-DRD-MAS Document 85 Filed 12/01/09

A FINAL NOTE

This is not the end. We are only beginning to shine the light on this formerly secretive issue. Hardnox, the keeper of the archives for this subject, has lots more. We will continue to expose more about the RNC’s fumbling to our readers in the coming months as we approach the 2014 mid-term elections.

Stay tuned to ‘Nox & Friends for more reporting on this issue.

~~~

ALERT: Truckers to Shut Down America………..

 for 3 days, Oct. 11 to Oct 13

My fellow Patriot this effort is to support the truckers in a major shut down of America in a 3 day strike October 11th through 13th. Obamacare will be in effect and most people will be ready to take action. No commerce on those days stock up on items that you will need. No banking no shopping no money transactions.

It does not matter If a million or 50 roll through DC in this effort. Congress will listen to We The People. Which is remove Obama from office for crimes of treason and misdemeanors. We want Congressional hearing on Benghazi and Seal Team 6. Louis Learner put in jail. No amnesty, remove all Muslims in our government that do not uphold the Constitution. Remove Eric Holder from office for crimes against the people and the Constitution. Last but not least is Fuel prices.

*********************************************************************

The above message was taken from their Face Book page.

If you have a Face Book account go to their page and tell them you support them. It’s about time somebody took it upon themselves to make a strong and bold statement to our government that something needs to be done about the King.

All they are asking of us is to NOT shop for 3 days, no banking for 3 days, no money transactions and they are giving us warning so we can get prepared for those 3 days. We can do this. Even if you don’t have a Face Book account you can join in the effort by getting ready for the 3 day shut down. This is not much to ask of the rest of us patriots.

Here is the Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/truckerstoshutdownamerica

 

%d bloggers like this: