Bottom Line… the myth being trumpeted by the White House is that Obama can ratify this thing because it is an “executive agreement.”
I wonder where they found that in the Constitution?
It doesn’t really matter does it? Because, Congress can simply refuse to fund it. But, will they?
As Written By: Alex Newman for The New AmericanAmid an illegal plot to “ratify” a United Nations treaty on “climate change” without the constitutionally required advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, Obama is behaving more and more like a tinpot dictator looting what remains of a collapsing banana republic. As part of the effort to defend the unconstitutional scheme to bypass Congress and “ratify” the UN climate regime, however, the White House and its globalist allies are twisting themselves into legalistic and rhetorical pretzels — and setting up the UN scheme for failure. The formal announcement ahead of the upcoming Communist Chinese-led G20 confirms what The New American first reported over two years ago.The UN, Obama, and Beijing are all hoping to get the agreement “ratified” before or during the G20 meeting in early September, according to news reports. Unlike the U.S. Congress, which Obama knows will not approve his dangerous UN “climate” regime, even the rubber-stamp legislature serving the brutal communist dictatorship enslaving mainland China is getting an opportunity to weigh in on ratifying the so-called “Paris Agreement.” Beijing’s propaganda organs are making a big show out of the fact that the “Standing Committee” of the “National People’s Congress” is deliberating on whether to ratify the controversial UN deal.By contrast, Obama plans to pretend to ratify it all by himself. Fortunately for Americans, though, by bypassing the proper ratification process, Obama is all-but ensuring that the “climate” treaty, negotiated in Paris last year, will eventually go down in flames. In fact, federal law now officially prohibits any U.S. funding for the UN climate bureaucracy, whether Obama pretends to ratify the UN climate deal or not. The strange turn of events vis-à-vis Obama, China, and the UN follows bizarre comments by former UN “Climate” Czarina Christiana Figueres, who blasted the U.S. political system but said the murderous Chinese regime was doing it right when it comes to battling alleged man-made global warming.
The blatantly fraudulent “legal argument” being advanced by Obama and the White House is that the UN Paris Agreement is actually an “executive agreement.” Therefore, they claim, Obama can ratify it with nothing more than his pen. In the real world, of course, the UN, the French government that oversaw the negotiations, and practically every government on earth have declared the Paris Agreement to be a “binding international treaty.” Indeed, the document itself makes that clear, with the word “shall” appearing in the text more than 100 times.
Read More: http://www.thenewamerican.com/
Sometimes I feel like I could take a baseball bat to Congress and the people who voted for this lawless dictator, Barack Hussein Obama.
I often wonder about his voters. Just think of his name, BHO. What American family names their child, “Hussein”.
I’m getting off target here. Nowhere in the Constitution, which Hussein tells us he knows so well, (snark) is there any such thing as an “executive agreement”. He and his minions just throw up a few words out of nowhere to justify what this dictator is doing.
They may have gotten their ideas from a pizza parlor, where the chef just throws a new item onto the pizza hoping it will turn out to be palatable.
And for Congress, they better get off their butts and do something about this. Somehow I don’t think they will since they probably benefit from this “hoax”. Follow the money.