Wicked Commentary

From the New American:


It’s no secret that President Obama and the would-be global governors at the United Nations are anxious to disarm the American people. Now they’re looking to hire some help in getting it done.

From the UN’s Programme of Action and Arms Trade Treaty, to his own executive orders, Obama is pursuing every available avenue toward de facto repeal of the Second Amendment and the God-given right to keep and bear arms that it protects.

Over the next few weeks, though, the UN is looking to add personnel to its gun grabbing gestapo. In a job advertisement open until July 26, the UN is looking for a “Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer.”

What will this bureaucrat’s bailiwick be? Here’s a summary of the job description as posted by the UN:

Act as a Focal Point for DDR [Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration] components for 2-3 missions, responsible for planning, support to implementation and evaluation;

Advise, develop and review (as appropriate) initial DDR functional strategy and concept of operations for further development into a full programme by the DDR component and the National DDR Commission;

Provide Headquarters support in planning the civilian and military logistics support for DDR;

Continually review DDR programme strategy and implementation through relevant documents, reports and code cables;

Conduct field missions to assess implementation of established DDR programmes;

Identify potential problems and issues to be addressed and suggest remedies to DDR units in the field; and

Liaise with others (UN, regional organizations [sic] and Member States) providing DDR training.

As if the list of tasks assigned to the disarmament specialist isn’t enough to fire up patriots who own firearms and refuse to have them seized by the UN or the Obama administration, the UN wants to base this office in New York City!

It is more than a little incompatible that a country that places such a high value on gun ownership that it enshrined it in its Bill of Rights participates in an organization that has such disdain and disregard for those rights that it is opening a disarmament office in that country.

Lest anyone think that there’s nothing to fear from this agent of disarmament, consider the definitions of disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration provided by the UN on an information page linked to the job opening announcement:

Disarmament is the collection, documentation, control and disposal of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons from combatants and often from the civilian population.

Demobilization is the formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces and groups, including a phase of “reinsertion” which provides short-term assistance to ex-combatants.

Reintegration is the process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain sustainable employment and income. It is a political, social and economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in communities at the local level.

The objective of the DDR process is to contribute to security and stability in post-conflict environments so that recovery and development can begin. DDR helps create an enabling environment for political and peace processes by dealing with security problem that arises when ex-combatants are trying to adjust to normal life, during the vital transition period from conflict to peace and development.

Notably, the UN will require the DDR specialist to help disarm ex-combatants. Is this mission not an eery echo of recent efforts in the United States to keep veterans from owning firearms? Perhaps, unbeknownst to the American people, President Obama has already been using his infamous “pen” and “phone” to carry out the disarmament of veterans in furtherance of some higher-level UN strategy.

Could it be also that the rapid militarization of local law enforcement in the United States could be another tactic in the piecemeal, surreptitious deployment of “troops” capable of carrying out a forcible forfeiture of firearms?

As reported by the National Rifle Association’s Ginny Simone, there are those on the inside who have raised the warning voice.

Simone reports that in 2012, Ambassador Faith Whittlesey, a U.S. delegate to the UN Small Arms Conference, revealed that the UN’s ultimate goal is to disarm all Americans in the name of global peace and an end to armed violence.

“In New York, right here on our own shores, we’ve got a Trojan horse. They won’t accept U.S. firearms policy,” Whittlesey said. “They want to take the decision away from the U.S. electorate and undermine our Constitution.”

Regardless of the reason, Americans must adamantly refuse to allow the UN to establish an office of disarmament on our own shores. We must demonstrate our ancestors’ zeal for liberty, particularly regarding the fundamental right to oppose tyranny by force of arms.

If we do not, we may soon be subject to the full expression of the authority of the U.S.-based DDR specialist and be left defenseless in the fight against absolutism.

Joe A. Wolverton, II, J.D. is a correspondent for The New American and travels nationwide speaking on nullification, the Second Amendment, the surveillance state, and other constitutional issues.


There is apparently no end to the lengths the person we have as a president, a criminal himself, will go to get us disarmed.  Of course he does this one again by his phone and pen.  With the way the SCOTUS has been ruling about his abuse of power I doubt this one would stand up in court either. Good luck you fraud!  Americans are sick of you now.  Those who voted for you regret it.


Comments on: "UN to Set Up a U.S.-based Disarmament Specialist" (16)

  1. Molon labe.


    • peppermintfarm said:

      Absolutely Paulie

      It’s a pleasure to see you and the very first comment since I’ve been gone.


  2. BTW: good to see you back!


  3. Bob Roller said:

    Let the games begin.


  4. GREAT to see you back on line Pepper.
    A lot of dirty sewer water from this administration has went under the proverbial bridge since your last post. It is no surprise that Obambuzzler is continually trying to take guns away from the citizens, because he can’t over run a very well armed population. At the last count, Americans have 88 guns per 100 people. That number has protected America from a foreign invasion. Why else would the UN want to disarm Americans? The UN’s tactic is to whittle away at the number of guns Americans own and to hinder the ammo availability. I hope the House of Representative continue to block the UN. attempts.


    • peppermintfarm said:

      Thank you Walt. Good to see you too. And thanks for coming back here after I’ve been away so long.

      Well the buzzard in the WH did this with his pen and phone, an EO. He never consulted Congress because he knows they would not approve this. It’s UN-Constituional what he did but he isn’t concerned with that one iota. Our Constitution trumps the UN or any other outside group. So he’s barking up the wrong tree and will get shot down in court over this. If there will ever be an outrage it will be over this except those who are so anti-gun. They have no idea what they would be in for.


    • Bob Roller said:

      Is there anyone on this list that will peacefully surrender their GOD given rights to a colony of hottentots?As I said,let the games begin.


  5. Peppermint,
    Happier than I can say to have you back – I argue with so many who insist people do not need this weapon or that weapon to protect their family from robbers – they are correct, I need them to protect me from tyrannical governments – the rational for the second amendment – but I understand them, they are never rational.


    • peppermintfarm said:


      How nice of you to say that. Good to see you!

      People who think they don’t need weapons to defend themselves against burglars, robbers, whatever they may be are plain nuts in my view. The number of people using drugs has gone up exponentially and they do break into houses to get money for their drug habits.

      Not to have any kind of real defense is leaving their families at big risk. I have my German shepherd plus the necessary other things you stated. I’m not leaving myself open to danger without defense.

      Right the 2nd Amendment was exactly for what you said and those other people are never rational.


  6. Gar Swaffar said:

    Si vis pacem parbellum
    I think I would prefer they set up camp here in the Leftifornia Foothills. Or at least this coast.

    TRE for those who understand.


    • peppermintfarm said:

      Hi Gar,

      I think I know why you want them to set up camp in Leftifornia. LOL! You go guy!


  7. bullright said:

    Good post, Pepp. Wow, some scary stuff, gives new meaning to hired guns. Doesn’t it figure. He’ll have to have others do his dirty work. I guess its been nice and quiet under the radar. He’s got enough scandals running diversion, that’s for sure.


    • peppermintfarm said:

      Thanks Bull.

      I recall a long time ago Glen Beck saying while crap is hitting on one hand, look at what the other hand is up to. Gives a whole new meaning like you said. He gets almost everybody else to his dirty work and acts innocent over it. You know, he knows nothing until he reads it in the newspaper or sees it on TV. Argh!


We welcome all comments, opinions, rants, raves, and humor too

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: