Wicked Commentary

That is if you see Maureen Dowd’s column in the NY Times:

Published: April 28, 2012

“Bishops Play Church Queens as Pawns”


(Leave it to Maureen to go for the trifecta)

For openers she says:
 “IT is an astonishing thing that historians will look back and puzzle over, that in the 21st century, American women were such hunted creatures.

Even as Republicans try to wrestle women into chastity belts, the Vatican is trying to muzzle American nuns.

Who thinks it’s cool to bully nuns? While continuing to heal and educate, the community of sisters is aging and dying out because few younger women are willing to make such sacrifices for a church determined to bring women to heel.

Yet the nuns must be yanked into line by the crepuscular, medieval men who run the Catholic Church. “

*see link below, as only NYT can do it.

(BTW: I’m not a Catholic)

That’s the entire diatribe I’ll use just to make the point:  war is definitely on. It may have come a little late this year, post Easter, but I suppose better fashionably late than never. And it’s never too late to take on Catholics or the Church in Rome, it’s always open season.

We don’t have to recap their probing reconnaissance missions earlier with their “GOP’s war on women” campaign about ‘contraceptives, the Catholic Church, and video tape’ of  Ms Fluke  testifying before Congress – i.e. let free contraceptives for women rain down like manna from the sky.  (Obama sure has a strange way of courting the Catholic vote)

Now all artillery is aimed at the Church in Rome and any evangelicals who get in their way.  The Left is also cranking up their “war on poverty” campaign as well. If they misfire at the Nuns and the Vatican, they can just revert to their socialist pious “Republican’s are against poor people” mantra.  So they’ll trot out their minions and clergy allies with selected quotes – as if the left are objective theologians. 

Well, they usurped or took de facto control of all areas of culture, so why not go for broke with Christianity and monasteries – just to keep faithful well heeled and in line.  At least that’s the plan.  You never know, “the One” might need a few Catholics to put him over the polls if women, unions, and the Latinos fall short.

I’m done with the rant.  But there you are:  another strategy of Leftists’ ongoing war on Christianity, Christians and culture as we know it – or knew it.  The reaction they would like is “all quiet on the western front”, which it certainly is not under their carpet-bombing raids.  This should merge with their Alynsky class warfare tactics. If he can’t have “the Catholic” vote in block, then at least he will cause as much friction and angst in their ranks that their voice is diluted, in more than one way. 

Reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/dowd-bishops-play-church-queens-as-pawns.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general

Advertisements

Comments on: "So Democrats ‘War on Religion’ Is Officially On by PrivateBullRight" (41)

  1. Davetherave said:

    bull,

    Good post, but this one really pushed my button so here I go!

    That f*cking Dowd bitch is one piece of shit. She’s gotta be a dike. I think unborn children are the most hunted in the 21st century. And who are they hunted by? Women!!!!! Obamahitlerstalin is really showing just how desperate he’s getting. He’s using every whore flunky he has to call out open war on everyone that is not a commie/fag/lesbo/muzzie/atheist/illegal/nut job and this shit is going to catch up with him…in my opinion. There is an old saying, “Never raise more demons than you can handle.” Me thinks Obamahitlerstalin is now raising way too many.

    Like

    • privbullright said:

      Dave, LOL
      Glad to see it pressed your button. That’s how we know we’re alive. I agree, let’s hope shit rolls down hill right through his door. “Raising way too many”…good and wise philosophy there. They don’t have enough on their plate?–yet? A mentor of mine used to say, “don’t let the devil hear what you’re thinking”. I try not to. But in their case, they don’t care. We all know what they’re thinking; it ain’t puurdy, they brag and tell us everyday. I am no apologist for Rome but the “bullying”? Duh, I can see who’s doing that unapologetically. The feminazi goons are out in force. This was an air assault from 30,000 feet.

      Like

      • Davetherave said:

        Speaking of raising to many demons bull; did ya’ see where even Arianna Huffington (probably the number one idiot in our country) even called out Obamahitlerstalin for using the Bin Laden situation as a campaign slogan? If you can get her to say something bad about a liberal, especially Obamahitlerstalin; then I would say he’s maybe starting to go to far.

        Like

        • privbullright said:

          Rave:
          Starting to crack like the lines in Arianna’s face. Ha ha. Oh, Zero gave her a nice juicy plug at the correspondents dinner. He’s probably afraid of her as much as the Secret Service.

          Like

          • Davetherave said:

            The bull,

            I think the cracks in Arianna’s face go all the way through her skull into her brain! If my computer would allow me (which it will not), I’d love to jump over to Huffpo and check out some of the comments by the lefty loons about her comment. I wonder if they are turning on her or Obamahitlerstalin? My guess; they are being loyal to the Queen Bee and Obamahitlerstalin is getting the shaft…

            Like

        • privbullright said:

          Oops, another crack in the wall, Dan Rather-be-biased says: “I have no idea what kind of president Gov. Romney will make, but I do think . . . he has a good chance of becoming president”.
          Mmm, mmm, mm Barack Hussein Obama. Like to see him slow jammin’ that.

          Like

          • Davetherave said:

            I read about this one more crack yesterday. Of all people…Dan Rather! “slow jammin'”…LMAO! He best start getting his jive talking on soon, because when lefty loons like Rather and Huffington start finding holes in Obamahitlerstalin and openly speak of it I believe there may be trouble in River City that starts with a “B” and rhymes with “G” and means goodbye…

            Like

  2. privbullright said:

    On a related note: here is a good column that illustrates the Lefts’ approach perfectly. It must have been a little too controversial for TH but it’s on another site. His trademark wit is right on target. http://thpatriots.blogspot.com/2012/04/mike-adams-old-rubber-cross.html

    Like

    • goshawk3 said:

      Bull, good article and timely. The left has been hard at work trying to denigrate Catholics.

      Oh, BTW, That article ‘old rubber cross’ is posted on TH.

      Like

      • privbullright said:

        Hawk,
        Thanks, they do have their favorite targets. Don’t they? I saw his article there first and then it vanished from TH. I have to check again. I got a good chuckle from that, but its the truth.

        Like

    • Davetherave said:

      bull,

      Great info! Personally; I would have sent Ms. Smith to the Western KY ER for some hands on training in first aid…

      Like

      • privbullright said:

        Dave: LOL hands on.
        Don’t you love their “visual dialogue” technique? Next time someone litters or vandalizes, they can tell the cop they were “adding visual dialogue”. He’ll be impressed. Does she realize there are people in poor countries who would give anything to have just one condom and she’s wasting them. Or how about adding to Globull Warming with her visual dialogue? The men in the white tubber suits should have picked her up.

        Like

  3. Susie Owens said:

    I guess I don’t understand any of this. Is this putting Catholic down? Please explain. For I am a Catholic

    Like

    • privbullright said:

      Hi Susie, welcome. Sorry, it may be confusing. No mineis certainly not an anti-Catholic article. I’ve a feeling the Dowd piece is pretty much criticizing the Catholic Church since I did not see one good thing she said about it. As I said, open season. I was taking issue with her article linked above.(you can read the whole thing, she pulled no punches) She seemed to stick her big proud nose right in. I was just pointing out how bad the left is at it. When I looked at the comments on her miece they seemed to all agree with her. Its strange I didn’t see many disagreeing with her and her depiction of the Catholic Church. The wider point is that we are all on the hit list, Christians in general, just that I think she took aim at the biggest target. I’d like to know why she doesn’t take issue with how Muslims treat women, or Islam in general. They won’t attak them directly. But the Christians? They have no problem attacking them, us. I hope that clarified it somewhat. I think they’d like to drive a wedge between the Nuns and Rome IMHO. They expect us to think they are looking out for women. We’ve seen the way they treat plenty of women who don’t follow they’re liberal agenda. I believe that is more what its about: corralling Catholic women (and all Catholics) into their corner, for politics of course.

      Like

      • goshawk3 said:

        Bull,

        The cowards won’t take issue with how Muslims treat women because they know that they could have their heads chopped off!

        Like

  4. MoDo gets even LESS lovin’ than REAL nuns. You must forgive her. Anyone takes this twittering twat seriously needs to chill,and have a drink. Dowd is simply an idiot inflated with her own view of her “importance”,and relevance.

    Like

    • privbullright said:

      Clyde:
      Well put– and politically correct of course. She sort of reminds me of the pretender Kathleen (Bates) Parker but with more twitter followers and bigger fangs. Obama likes his sycophants at the NYT.

      Like

    • privbullright said:

      Clyde and like al the self-absorbed clowns at the Times they make themselves relevant. Just like the inflated egomaniac psycho-windbag in the WH. Scary that people actually take them serious.

      Like

  5. willibeaux said:

    Bull! Mo Dowd is a frustrated old bag who was dropped by her boyfriend awhile back and she’s taking it out on the Christians. Ignoring her is the best solution.

    “ooRah! 😉

    Like

    • privbullright said:

      Right Willi, for the most part. But sometimes you have to point out the hyperbole.(or pop it) Know who won’t ignore it? Obama told a reporter, “I read all of the New York Times columnists.” Actually they are probably loaded in his teleprompter. Me thinks its going to get worse this year.

      Like

    • Davetherave said:

      Willi,

      I have to respectfully disagree with ignoring MoDo. I think part of the mess we are currently in is that we have ignored these type lunatics for so long that it has allowed them to get a footing without their lack of intellect being challenged. Way too many ignored Obamahitlerstalin’s background and look where that got us. I’m of the mind frame the days of ignoring should be long gone and it’s time for our side to come out swinging and knocking these morons dead on their ass. It’s time to take the war to them…

      Like

      • privbullright said:

        Okay,point taken. I realize it might be giving lil’ ol’ MODO more attention than she deserves but it just tripped my patience trigger. The libs can flame anything that stands in their way of their political agenda. This it me on a few levels. If they were sincere critics that would be one thing, But they aren’t, they never are. They are the same ones who demand people have respect for this fraud of a Prez. Then they say Nuns should be rapping the knuckles of the Pope and call men medieval. But they suggest culture should dictate to Christians, and we should go with [their] flow, get with the times. They expect the politics of the left should trump Church teachings or matters of faith. With little to base it on, they ridicule anyone who doesn’t agree.

        She titles “Bishops play queens as pawns” Now if anyone is using women for pawns its libs and the left, which is all they care about… political ideology. They’ll play blacks for pawns, Latinos for pawns, union workers for pawns,single moms, etc. And they want them all on the ranch where they belong.(voting for Dem Liberals)

        Would the Times also print a response to her piece? Probably not. She knew she could shout out to Catholic bashers and anti-Christian bigots alike. Have a Party. As Obama says, “Are you in?”. They love this stuff. I would have said war on Christians but it is deeper than that, its war on [organized] religion, The cultural left wants between Christians and matters of faith. We’re talking “Inquisition” run by the left. Yet they won’t take the same attitude to Muslims or Islam, people who murder women and call it honor killing. Be careful talking about that. They won’t be this critical of those who kill Christians, including women and children worshipping in churches. They don’t have much to say about that. But did you hear them about the murder of Tiller the baby killer abortionist? Yea, they could lash out at ALL Christians for that. They can lecture the Pope, cardinals, and faithful Catholics, or those speaking out against abortions; but not Mohamed or Imams or their own haters on the left. Even people talking about Tiller were ridiculed as haters and intolerant, while they are the intolerant left. (gods to themselves) I should feel guilty for raining on their parade?

        Like

      • privbullright said:

        Dave, sorry I crossed up the last response. Right I agree. You said it. They indiscriminately fire away, and we take it or just ignore it. (usually)Intellect is generous. LOL When I see them talking about “push back” and Obama sending out tuth squads it all makes my skin crawl.

        Like

  6. Susie Owens said:

    Hi
    and thanks for the infor I am a catholic woman and no one tells me what to do without a fight

    Like

    • privbullright said:

      Susie: Hey, and I sure wouldn’t try. Their schtick just gets a little old, every year they crank up the anti-Christian crapola. This year seems more ‘loud and proud’ than ever. They intentionally picked a fight. Her article is only another piece of it.

      Like

      • PBR,

        Good article about how the left and the Liar in Chief feel like it’s A-OK to attack the Catholic church. He may be very sorry he did this. He will lose the Catholic vote. Why they voted for him the last time is a mystery to me however.

        Being a Catholic myself I could never vote for someone who LOVES abortion the way the Fraud does.

        And Maureen Dowd is simply a vapid creature.

        Like

        • privbullright said:

          Pepp, Thanks and great visuals, she is another usefoul idiot, I guess, but a loud one. They do it because they can. Why could some support him? I don’t know either. I don’t know why other evangelicals do either, or Jes for that matter. He shows contempt for all. But I see his ads all over the web “Are You In?” Yea, Barry, I’m in (ha ha)… but not your slave, and definately not your bitch. 🙂

          Like

          • PBR,

            LOL! Dowd is definitely one of the useful idiots. Can you imagine being that stupid? These people have cow manure for brains, that is if Dowd can actually think. She mostly dribbles and froths at all things republican.

            Like

          • Davetherave said:

            MoDo farted the other day and someone said, “Excuse me, I didn’t understand you!” 🙂

            Like

  7. privbullright said:

    Pepp & Dave:
    I waded through most of the comments on there to see if anyone told her off or to shove it. I couldn’t find anyone. Which makes me wonder where do these people exist, did they annex out America or something and this was the result?

    Like

    • Davetherave said:

      “Annex out America”…ROTFLMAO! I have no idea where in the hell these people live that swallow the drivel that comes from the mouth of people like MoDo, but with the internet the sumbitches could live in eff’ing Iran for all we know. Also; they probably moderated and deleted any comments that did not pump her up like a hot air balloon…

      Like

  8. gunnyginalaska said:

    Maureen Dowd is an idiot and about 15 years ago or so, I ripped her a new one in a letter after she denigrated the military and got an apology letter BACk that I immediately sh8tcanned.

    Like

    • privbullright said:

      Gunny, Great …Wow, impressive, must be her only apology. A few weeks back she went psycho on SCOTUS. They shouldn’t expect an apology though.

      Like

    • goshawk3 said:

      Gunny,

      A way to go with Dowd! I agree she’s and absolute idiot as well as a phony. I don’t know if you saw it but some time ago a TV show featured Dowd giving a party to her so-called elite
      friends.

      She about made me barf. She was dripping in jewels, and running around greeting people like something out of B movie. A cocktail in hand, she’d swoon “Daaaaling, where have you been keeping yourself?” *Kiss-Kiss*

      Like

  9. First they came for the Catholics….I’m protestant but I stand with the Catholic Church on this issue. There is and has been an ongoing war on God, morality and all things decent and good. Now we have women fighting for their Supreme Court granted right to kill their own children AND they want someone else (taxpayers) to fund it! They also want us to pay for their contraceptives, not that any of them will bother to use them at the appropriate time. I have never seen so many people fighting to become slaves under total government (tyranny) control! Goes back to publicly educated kids that never got a failing grade in school, yet they cannot comprehend what they can read, they can’t write anything original or thoughtful and they can’t add 2+2, so what else is new?

    Like

    • privbullright said:

      FOH, very well put. First they came for the_____…
      Yes, surounding abortion they built an industry. On top of it now comes the unbleievable irony of this phony “GOP’s war on women” charge. The left has a “war on truth”. I guess nothing matters to the left or its youth, as long as they’re trained to vote the right way. “add 2+2″(LOL)…how many times do they have to count the votes? Answer-until they win.

      Like

We welcome all comments, opinions, rants, raves, and humor too

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: